nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo searchdiv qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2023, 12, v.14 50-61+145
“多元”与“一体”的辐合:论顾颉刚的中华民族共同体思想
基金项目(Foundation): 教育部民族教育发展中心委托项目“铸牢中华民族共同体意识教育”阶段性成果
邮箱(Email):
DOI:
摘要:

“中华民族多元一体格局”是费孝通的著名论断,蕴含着中华民族“多元”与“一体”的辐合关系。在费孝通提出这一理论之前,顾颉刚就对中华民族“多元”与“一体”的关系做过系统论述。费孝通的中华民族多元一体格局理论的形成与他当年跟顾颉刚对“中华民族是一个”的讨论密不可分。总体来看,中华民族的形成是漫长且复杂的历史过程,也是各民族不断交往交流交融形成不可分割、紧密团结的民族共同体的发展过程。“多元”是中华民族的特有属性,“一体”是中华民族的固有格局,中华民族多元一体格局的形成是“多元”与“一体”的深度辐合。中华民族已经形成了“你中有我,我中有你”的多元一体格局。在铸牢中华民族共同体意识的实践中,借鉴和学习顾颉刚有关中华民族的思考,不断完善已有的理论研究成果,有助于铸牢中华民族共同体意识,为中华民族伟大复兴奠定基础。

Abstract:

“The Pattern of Diversity in Unity of the Chinese Nation” is a famous assertion by Fei Xiaotong,which contains the convergence between“diversity” and“unity” of the Chinese nation. In fact,before Fei Xiaotong proposed this theory,Gu Jiegang had systematically discussed the relationship between “diversity” and “unity” of the Chinese nation. Overall,“diversity” is a unique attribute of the Chinese nation. “Diversity ” represents ethnic diversity. The Chinese nation is a multi-ethnic community formed of 56 ethnic groups who depend on each other and are integrated with each other. The 56 ethnic groups are the basic units that make up the Chinese nation,and “diversity”,to a certain extent,has the meaning of being the “multi-source” from various ethnic groups;meanwhile,“diversity” implies cultural and ecological diversity,and refers to the integration of multiple ethnic elements by the Chinese nation.Gu Jiegang believes that in history,early ethnic groups were “multi-source ”,but the Chinese nation was not “multi-source” . He states that there is no need to worry too much about the “diversity” of the Chinese nation,and there is no need to erase the characteristics of various ethnic groups as a result. One should recognize the reality of ethnic relations: The Chinese nation has formed an inseparable and closely united national entity,and “diversity ” is precisely the unique attribute of the Chinese nation. “Unity” is the inherent pattern of the Chinese nation. The Chinese nation is a diverse and integrated entity,and it is also a community with a shared future for the coordinated development of all ethnic groups.Gu Jiegang believes that there are no other nations within the Chinese nation,let alone races in the sense of “multi-source” . In the process of integrating people of all ethnic groups into a “unity”,“culture ” plays a very important role. The formation of “the Pattern of Diversity in Unity of the Chinese Nation” is precisely the deep convergence of “diversity ” and “unity ” . Due to longterm ethnic exchanges and intermarriage,the Chinese nation has formed an integrated national pattern,and all ethnic groups have become “one ”,which is the“diversity in unity” of the Chinese nation. The theory of “the Pattern of Diversity in Unity of the Chinese Nation” is a vivid interpretation of the convergence of ethnic diversities and national unity,and it is also the theoretical core of the current ideology of the Chinese national community.Throughout the discussion on the diversity and unity of the Chinese nation,Gu Jiegang's ideas have room for reference,but there are also shortcomings. In the context of strengthening a strong sense of community for the Chinese nation,one should organically integrate Gu Jiegang's theory with that of Fei Xiaotong,strengthen one's understanding and reflection on the “Pattern of Diversity in Unity of the Chinese Nation”,and continuously improve the theoretical research results. One must fully recognize the history and reality of long-term communication,interaction,and integration among various ethnic groups within the Chinese nation,adhere to the concept of Chinese national community,forge the awareness of the Chinese national community,strengthen the “three contacts ” and“mutual embedding”,enhance the awareness of national unity,and ultimately achieve the goal of forging a strong sense of the Chinese national community,laying the foundation for the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation.

参考文献

[1]吴正彪,李永皇.论民族文化多元一体格局的实质与价值[J].贵州民族研究,2009,29(01):6-11.

[2]林崇德.心理学大辞典(上)[M].上海:上海教育出版社,2003.

[3]李振宏.顾颉刚疑古史学的现代价值[J].齐鲁学刊,2020(02):30-33.

[4] 马竹君.顾颉刚“层累说”的再审视——以大禹传说研究为中心[J].民俗研究,2018(03):92-101.

[5]刘永刚.“中华民族是一个”的论辩与中华民族理论的建构[J].中南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版),2020,40(02):1-6.

[6]娄贵品.“中华民族是一个”讨论背后的傅斯年与吴文藻[J].湖北民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2022,40(01):30-41.

[7]马戎.如何认识“民族”和“中华民族”——回顾1939年关于“中华民族是一个”的讨论[J].中南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版),2012,32(05):1-12.

[8]彭文斌,敬川.略论顾颉刚的“羌戎”研究及其对中华民族整体性探讨[J].青海民族大学学报(社会科学版),2022,48(03):1-6.

[9]杨红伟.西北考察与顾颉刚的民族思想[J].江汉论坛,2019(04):109-115.

[10]奂平清.论顾颉刚的中华民族共同体思想:以民族史编撰为中心[J].史学集刊,2021(03):85-95.

[11]赵旭东.国族之辩:以费孝通为核心的有关民族问题的一多之争[J].思想战线,2018,44(06):12-23.

[12]顾颉刚.古史辨自序(上)[M].石家庄:河北教育出版社,2000.

[13]宋蜀华.认识中华民族构成的一把钥匙——《中华民族多元一体格局》读后[J].中央民族大学学报,2000(03):25-26.

[14]常开霞,贺金瑞.“多元一体”:中国民族利益协调论纲[J].中央民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2009,36(06):5-10.

[15]顾颉刚.宝树园文存(卷四)[M].北京:中华书局,2011.

[16]王江成.国家认同建构:从“五族共和”到铸牢中华民族共同体意识[J].学术界,2022(09):155-164.

[17]庞中英.族群、种族和民族[J].欧洲,1996(06):4-15.

[18]费孝通.中华民族多元一体格局[M].北京:中央民族大学出版社,1999.

[19][英]霍恩比.牛津高阶英汉双解词典:第9版[M].李旭影等,译.北京:商务印书馆,2018.

[20]郑大华.中国近代民族主义话语下的“民族”“种族”和“国族”[J].史学月刊,2020(08):5-8.

[21]周平.现代国家的民族特性[J].江汉论坛,2023 (05):5-14.

[22]费孝通.顾颉刚先生百年祭[J].读书,1993(11):3-8.

[23]梁启超.饮冰室合集:专集之四十一[M].北京:中华书局,1989.

[24]李大钊.李大钊文集(上)[M].北京:人民出版社,1984.

[25]郑师渠.中华民族实现由自在转向自觉的鲜明标志——论李大钊的《新中华民族主义》[J].史学史研究,2020(04):17-20.

[26]梁启超.梁启超全集[M].北京:北京出版社,1999.

[27] 郑师渠.中华民族共同体意识的近代思想论争——从傅斯年、顾颉刚到费孝通、白寿彝[J].中国高校社会科学,2022(01):91-99+159.

[28]费孝通.关于民族问题的讨论[N].益世报,1939-05-01.

[29]费孝通.简述我的民族研究经历和思考[J].北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版),1997(2):5-13+159.

[30] 顾颉刚.续论“中华民族是一个”:答费孝通先生(续)[N].益世报,1939-05-29.

[31]周星.费孝通先生的民族理论[J].内蒙古大学艺术学院学报,2010,7(02):10-20.

[32]张积家,张姝玥.民族意识与中华民族共同体意识之关系[N].中国社会科学报,2022-05-19.

基本信息:

DOI:

中图分类号:C956

引用信息:

[1]于玲,张积家.“多元”与“一体”的辐合:论顾颉刚的中华民族共同体思想[J].民族学刊,2023,14(12):50-61+145.

基金信息:

教育部民族教育发展中心委托项目“铸牢中华民族共同体意识教育”阶段性成果

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文