| 2,645 | 4 | 268 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
文化不仅是由人自己编织的意义之网，还是从共同体内部影响成员选择的重要力量。在铸牢中华民族共同体意识视域下，建构系统化和可操作的中华文化认同分析框架具有重要的学理价值与现实意义。在既有文化认同理论的基础上，中华文化认同可阐释为文化主体对共享文化的符号认同、情感认同到行为认同的递进过程。通过语言文字交流载体、历史传承记忆纽带、文化艺术精神符号的具象认同，夯实中华文化认同的认知基础。中华文化的归属感、依恋感、忠诚感联结激活文化认同的情感内核。系统阐释文化适应的包容实践、文化自觉的理性认知、文化创新的时代探索等动态行为，有助于实现中华文化认同从认知到行动的有效转化。以“符号—情感—行为”完整逻辑闭环构建的中华文化认同分析框架既能为后续相关实证研究提供路径指引，更能为凝聚中华民族共识、破解文化传承与发展中的难题、推动中华民族共同体建设迈向更深层次提供实践参考。
Abstract：Cultural identity represents the deepest form of identification within the sense of community for the Chinese nation, playing a cruci-al role in enhancing national cohesion and solidari-ty. This paper synthesizes perspectives from multi-ple disciplines to conduct an in-depth analysis of the connotation and dimensions of Chinese cultural identity. Its aim is to construct an actionable framework that provides theoretical support and practical guidance for forging a sense of community for the Chinese nation. In alignment with both Chi-nese and international cultural identity models, as well as in response to the demands of building a cultural community of the Chinese nation, this study interprets Chinese cultural identity as a three-dimensional system—including symbolic i-dentity, emotional identity, and behavioral identi-ty—through which diverse cultural subjects identify with shared culture. Cultural symbolic identity can be defined as the visible form of Chinese cultural identity, en-compassing identification with linguistic communi-cation symbols, national historical inheritance sym-bols, and cultural and artistic spiritual symbols: Language and writing serve as fundamental tools for cultural transmission and communication; national historical inheritance symbols carry the collective memory and spiritual lineage of the Chinese na-tion; and cultural and artistic symbols highlight the unique aesthetic tastes and value pursuits of the Chinese nation. The recognition and identification with these symbols provides a prerequisite for emo-tional and behavioral identity. Cultural emotional identity represents the e-motional sharing dimension of Chinese cultural i-dentity, including a sense of belonging, attach-ment, and loyalty to Chinese culture. A sense of belonging reflects an individual's identification with the community of the Chinese nation; a sense of attachment embodies deep emotional affinity to Chinese culture; and a sense of loyalty demon-strates an individual's commitment to upholding the values inherent in Chinese culture. As the core of cultural identity, emotional identity can inspire in-dividuals to engage in deeper exploration of Chi-nese culture and provides intrinsic motivation for behavioral identity. Cultural behavioral identity serves as a practi-cal manifestation of Chinese cultural identity, en-compassing a dynamic process of cultural adapta-tion, cultural consciousness, and cultural innova-tion. Cultural adaptation is reflected in an individual's proactive integration into the Chinese cultural environment and their adherence to the be-havioral norms and values of Chinese culture; cul-tural consciousness manifests in an individual's ini-tiative to inherit and promote Chinese culture, as well as their conscious resistance against the en-croachment of negative cultural influences; and cultural innovation involves the process of evolving and developing traditional culture to align with the needs of the times, thereby endowing Chinese cul-ture with new vitality. As the ultimate embodiment of cultural identity, behavioral identity realizes the “unity of knowledge and action” in cultural identity.In the context of the new era, strengthening Chinese cultural identity is of paramount impor-tance for addressing cultural challenges, enhancing cultural confidence, and constructing a unified na-tional cultural identity. The theoretical framework constructed in this article integrates symbolic cog-nition, emotional sharing, and behavioral practice, revealing an internal logic of symbolic identity as the foundation, emotional identity as the core, and behavioral identity as the practical application. This framework not only provides actionable guid-ance for future empirical research but also facili-tates the inheritance and development of Chinese culture, laying a solid ideological and spiritual foundation for the construction of the community of the Chinese nation.
[1]Freud S.Group psychology and the analysis of the ego[M].London:The Hogarth Press,1949.
[2]王琪瑛.中国社会认同研究十年[J].河海大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2013,15(04):29-34+90.
[3]章淼榕，杨君.从群体心理到认同建构——多学科视角下的身份认同研究述评[J].广东社会科学，2022(02):202-214.
[4]Tajfel,H.,& Turner,J.C.An integrative theory of intergroup conflict[A]// Hogg,M.A & Abrams.D (eds).Intergroup relations:Essential readings[M].Philadelphia:Psychology Press,2001.
[5]郎维伟，陈瑛，张宁.中华民族共同体意识与“五个认同”关系研究[J].北方民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2018(03):12-21.
[6]中共中央文献研究室.习近平关于社会主义政治建设论述摘编[G].北京：中央文献出版社，2017.
[7][日]星墅昭吉.全球政治学——全球化进程中的变动、冲突、治理与和平[M].刘小林，张胜军，译.北京：新华出版社，2000.
[8]吴玉军，付赵震.论国家认同视域中的民族认同建构[J].中国特色社会主义研究，2019(01):56-62+76.
[9]Geert H.Hofstede.Culture's Consequences:Comparing Values,Behaviors,Institutions and Organizations Across Nations[M].SAGE Publications,Inc,2001.
[10]Ashforth B E,Harrison S H,Corley K G.Identification in organizations:An examination of four fundamental questions[J].Journal of management,2008,34(03):325-374.
[11]Zhu D,Lin X.A study on the psychological structure and mechanism of shared Chinese cultural identity of university students[J].Frontiers in psychology,2022,13:943-989.
[12]张淑华.社会认知科学概论[M].北京：光明日报出版社，2009.
[13]Kuang L,Gao X,Liu B,et al.Research hotspots and frontiers of ethnic cultural identity——based on analysis of “web of science” database[J].Frontiers in psychology,2023,14:1-12.
[14]王瑞萍，马进，马虎银，乔娟.铸牢中华民族共同体意识若干重要问题研究[M].北京：中国社会科学出版社，2021.
[15]罗强强，钱佳乐.新时代文化认同危机及建设路径——兼论铸牢中华民族共同体意识[J].重庆工商大学学报(社会科学版),2020,37(05):84-91.
[16]朱晓琳，刘洋云，张玉柱，胡发稳.《中国多民族青少年文化认同问卷》在内蒙古地区大学生中的适用性检验[J].社会科学前沿，2018,7(12):1870-1880.
[17]王华敏，夏一鸿，罗琴.大学生中华文化认同的心理机制与影响因素——基于结构方程模型的实证分析[J].西南大学学报(社会科学版),2022,48(06):195-206.
[18]简臻锐.大学生对中华优秀传统文化认同的结构与结果探析——基于北京市9所高校大学生的实证调查[J].中国青年社会科学，2020,39(05):75-80.
[19]祖力亚提·司马义，刘庆斌.文化符号视域下铸牢中华民族共同体意识研究[J].社会科学战线，2023(04):212-218.
[20]周玉，廖小琴.中华文化认同的内涵、结构与实现路径——兼谈铸牢中华民族共同体意识[J].北方民族大学学报，2023(04):55-63.
[21]曾明，龚婷，戴登云，等.中华文化符号和中华民族形象的划定原则及类型特点[J].民族学刊，2021,12(07):1-8+102.
[22][德]恩斯特·卡西尔.人论[M].甘阳，译.上海：上海译文出版社，2004.
[23][美]约翰·塞尔.心灵、语言和社会——实在世界中的哲学[M].李步楼，译.上海：上海译文出版社，2001.
[24][英]安东尼·吉登斯.民族-国家与暴力[M].胡宗泽，赵力涛，译.王铭铭，校.北京：生活·读书·新知三联书店，1998.
[25]麻国庆.走进他者的世界[M].北京：学苑出版社，2001.
[26]王启涛.清朝“同文之治”新论[J].中央民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2024,51(05):71-79.
[27]周智生.何以想象为一家：云南各民族共祖神话的生成与流变[J].民族学刊，2023,14(07):23-33+156.
[28]张军.中华民族语言认同研究[M].北京：中国社会科学出版社，2023.
[29]郭光明.求同化异——两岸繁简字论争之我见[J].贵阳学院学报(社会科学版),2017,12(04):79-83.
[30]杜芳，徐泽惠.族群边界互动：中华民族共同体构建的稳定机制[J].民族学刊，2023,14(05):26-33+120.
[31][法]莫里斯·哈布瓦赫.论集体记忆[M].毕然，郭金华，译.上海：上海人民出版社，2002.
[32]任梦楠，廖茂忠.铸牢中华民族共同体意识的情感向度[J].民族学刊，2023,14(12):16-23+141.
[33]汤筠冰.艺术传播符号的理论脉络与形态分演[J].南京艺术学院学报，2015(05):150-154.
[34]周大鸣.文化人类学概论[M].广州：中山大学出版社，2009.
[35]姚君，丁云亮.传统节日文化呈现的符号修辞重构——以河南卫视“中国节日”系列节目为例[J].未来传播，2023,30(02):34-40.
[36][美]格尔兹.文化的解释[M].上海：上海人民出版社，1999.
[37]张晓燕，李凯昂.新疆高校少数民族大学生铸牢中华民族共同体意识教育模型建构——基于扎根理论的运用[J].民族学刊，2023,14(12):118-127+153.
[38]Ashmore R D,Deaux K,McLaughlin-Volpe T.An organizing framework for collective identity:articulation and significance of multidimensionality[J].Psychological bulletin,2004,130(01):80-114.
[39]Zdaniuk B,Levine J M.Group loyalty:Impact of members' identification and contributions[J].Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,2001,37(06):502-509.
[40]Huang W,Bi C.Development of the general perceived cultural identity scale[J].Advances in Psychology,2021,11(02):620-626.
[41]孔亭.铸牢中华民族共同体意识的科学内涵和精神实质[J].民族学刊，2024,15(12):1-9+142.
[42]Allen K A,Kern M L,Rozek C S,et al.Belonging:A review of conceptual issues,an integrative framework,and directions for future research[J].Australian journal of psychology,2021,73(01):87-102.
[43]Hagerty B M K,Lynch-Sauer J,Patusky K L,et al.Sense of belonging:A vital mental health concept[J].Archives of psychiatric nursing,1992,6(03):172-177.
[44]David O,Bar-Tal D.A sociopsychological conception of collective identity:The case of national identity as an example[J].Personality and Social Psychology Review,2009,13(04):354-379.
[45]Davis T C.Patterns of identity:Basques and the Basque nation[J].Nationalism and Ethnic Politics,1997,3(01):61-88.
[46]周婷，毕重增.地域多文化经验是否会削弱家乡文化自信：文化依恋的补偿作用[J].心理科学，2023,46(05):1131-1140.
[47]Druckman D.Nationalism,patriotism,and group loyalty:A social psychological perspective[J].Mershon international studies review,1994,38(01):43-68.
[48]张智琦，朱睿达，刘超.国家自豪感对亲社会行为的影响：群体类型和忠诚度的调节作用[J].科学通报，2020,65(19):1956-1966.
[49]VanVugt M,Hart C M.Social identity as social glue:the origins of group loyalty[J].Journal of personality and social psychology,2004,86(04):585-598.
[50]Baumeister R F,Leary M R.T.The Need to Belong:Desire for Interpersonal Attachments as a Fundamental Human Motivation[J].Psychological Bulletin,1995,117(03):497-529.
[51]Piquemal N.Cultural loyalty:Aboriginal students take an ethical stance[J].Reflective Practice,2005,6(04):523-538.
[52]Capozza,D.,& Brown,R.Social Identity Processes:Trends in theory and research[M].London·Thousand Oaks·New Delhi:Sage Publications,2000.
[53]Gaertner,S.L.& Dovidio,J.F.The Common Ingroup Identity Model[A]// P.A.M.Van Lange,A.W.Kruglanski & E.T.Higgins (eds).Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology (Volume2)[M].London:SAGE Publications Ltd,2012.
[54]Verkuyten M.Identity and Cultural Diversity:What Social Psychology Can Teach Us[M].London:Routledge,2014.
[55]Taifel,H.Social Identity and Intergroup Relations[M].New York:Cambridge University Press,1982.
[56]宋仕婕，佐斌，温芳芳，等.群体认同对群际敏感效应及其行为表现的影响[J].心理学报，2020,52(08):993-1003.
[57]韩震.论国家认同、民族认同及文化认同——一种基于历史哲学的分析与思考[J].北京师范大学学报(社会科学版),2010(01):106-113.
[58]Berry J W.Immigration,acculturation,and adaptation[J].Applied psychology,1997,46(01):5-34.
[59]聂伟，万鸯鸯.文化适应对少数民族农民工城镇落户意愿的影响——基于全国流动人口动态监测数据的分析[J].湖南农业大学学报(社会科学版),2018,19(01):46-52.
[60]费孝通.跨文化的“席明纳”——人文价值再思考之二[J].读书，1997(10):3-9.
[61]Phinney J S.Ethnic Identity in Adolescents and Adults:Review of Research[J].Psychological Bulletin,1999,108(03):499-514.
[62]袁文华.国家认同视域下青年国潮消费的表征、动因与引领[J].中国青年研究，2024(11):5-11+94.
[63]威尔·金里卡，刘曙辉.多民族国家中的认同政治[J].马克思主义与现实，2010(02):116-120.
[64][美]马文·哈里斯.文化的起源[M].黄晴，译.北京：华夏出版社，1988.
基本信息:
中图分类号:D633;G122
引用信息:
[1]宋锐,邓小兵.符号·情感·行为：铸牢中华民族共同体意识视域下的文化认同维度[J].民族学刊,2025,16(10):29-39+154.
基金信息:
甘肃省教育厅2025年创新之星项目“共同体视域下高校学生社交媒体使用与文化认同研究”(2025CXZX-023)阶段性成果