| 977 | 0 | 78 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
构筑中华民族共有精神家园能为铸牢中华民族共同体意识奠定坚实的精神和文化基础。在文化记忆视域中,中华文化符号为中华民族共有精神家园提供了认同基础,共同文化记忆有助于中华民族共有精神家园的文化传承,各民族交融共生推动中华民族共有精神家园创新发展。目前,虽然文化记忆为构筑中华民族共有精神家园提供了坚实基础,但仍面临西方理论应用的适配性和多学科协同研究不足、中华文化符号建设的碎片化与异化,以及文化记忆传播的代际差异和单向性问题。为此,需要从战略引领、理论支撑、实践赋能三个维度,将共有共享的文化记忆资源转化为铸牢中华民族共同体意识的生产性力量,共同推动文化记忆从保护对象转化为构筑中华民族共有精神家园的活性资源,最终实现个体情感归属、群体价值共识与民族复兴目标的深度契合,使中华民族共有精神家园从“文化符号建设”升维至“精神价值共生”,从而为实现中华民族伟大复兴提供坚实的精神支撑与强大的文化动力。
Abstract:Chinese cultural symbols function as a sign system carrying meaning,providing an intuitive basis for recognizing a common spiritual homeland for the Chinese nation;the shared cultural memory of the Chinese nation,when continually transmitted and interpreted,plays a vital role in transmitting the cultural heritage of this common spiritual homeland;furthermore,the symbiotic practice of communication interactions,and integration among various ethnic groups injects inexhaustible vitality into the development of this common spiritual homeland.This construction process is inherently dialectical and complex,with its essence rooted in navigating the relationship between“diversity”and“unity.”At present,while cultural memory presents abundant resources and a solid foundation for building a common spiritual homeland for the Chinese nation,several challenges persist in both theory and practice.In the domain of academic research,there are limitations in the adaptability of Western cultural memory theory in the Chinese context,coupled with a lack of multidisciplinary collaborative research.Regarding symbol construction and interpretation,the use of Chinese cultural symbols sometimes incurs risks of fragmentation and alienation;in terms of cultural memory communication,problems such as significant intergenerational differences,one-way indoctrination of communication methods,and poor connection with contemporary life—especially with respect to young people's emotional frameworks—hinder the intergenerational transmission of cultural memory and diminish the effectiveness of emotional resonance.To address these challenges,this article suggests that efforts should be made across three dimensions:First,it is necessary to strengthen strategic guidance and realize an organic integration of top-level design and grassroots innovation.The construction of a spiritual home should be situated within the overall strategy of the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation.This may be achieved through the building of a national cultural park system and the execution of major cultural projects,aimed at systematically integrating and showcasing the cultural memory landscape across various regions and ethnicities,while local places and groups should be encouraged to engage in creative transformation based on their own characteristics.Second,there is a need to deepen theoretical support and build localized academic and practical discourse systems.Based on the prominent features of Chinese civilization,relevant theories such as cultural memory should be creatively transformed and innovatively developed,thereby constructing an interdisciplinary research paradigm that can profoundly explain the formation mechanisms of the Chinese national community.Third,there ought to be a promotion of practical empowerment and communication innovation as well as an integration into everyday life.Digital technology should furthermore be actively used to revolutionize the modern expression and dissemination of cultural memory,creating an immersive and interactive experience.More importantly,the nurturing of cultural memory should be interwoven into the education system,community life,festival ceremonies,and literary and artistic creation,aligning closely with individuals'daily experiences,emotional journeys,and value pursuits.Ultimately,the objective is to achieve a deep integration between individual emotional attribution,group value consensus,and national rejuvenation goals,enabling the evolution of the common spiritual homeland for the Chinese nation from mere“cultural symbol construction”to a state of “spiritual value symbiosis.”
[1]铸牢中华民族共同体意识推进新时代党的民族工作高质量发展[N].人民日报,2023-10-29(01).
[2]习近平.在全国民族团结进步表彰大会上的讲话[N].人民日报,2024-09-28(02).
[3]乌小花,白晓艳,李安然.中华民族共有精神家园:概念内涵、核心要素与实践指向[J].新疆师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2023,44(05)30-37+2.
[4]邓观鹏,顾友仁.文化记忆视域下铸牢中华民族共同体意识的逻辑机理与实践进路[J].社会主义核心价值观研究,2024,10(02):76-89.
[5]杨立宾.构筑中华民族共有精神家园:逻辑理路、价值蕴含和实践路径[J].宁夏党校学报,2024,26(01):86-94.
[6][德]扬·阿斯曼.从集体记忆到文化记忆[C]//.陶东风,周宪.文化研究:第11辑.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2011:4.
[7]铸牢中华民族共同体意识推进新时代党的民族工作高质量发展[N].人民日报,2023-10-29(01).
[8]乌云格日勒.构筑中华民族共有精神家园的多维度解析[J].马克思主义研究,2024(04):19-25+49+154.
[9]刘彦.构筑中华民族共有精神家园的思想内涵和当代价值[J].北方民族大学学报,2025(04):15-23.
[10]张波,任艺璇.构筑中华民族共有精神家园的文化符号维度[J].江西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2025(06):3-11.
[11]沈桂萍,田源.建设中华民族现代文明与构筑中华民族共有精神家园——以学习贯彻习近平文化思想为视角[J].中华民族共同体研究,2024(01):5-19+169.
[12]郝忠彬.构筑中华民族共有精神家园研究[J].黑龙江民族丛刊,2025(04):77-82.
[13]姜术容.论中华民族共有精神家园的主体构筑逻辑[J].贵州民族研究,2025(06):63-69.
[14]青觉,刘泽锋.文化强国与中华民族共有精神家园的内在机理研究[J].黑龙江民族丛刊,2026(01):1-11.
[15]李昕.从文化记忆到人类记忆共同体——论意义生产中的道德固守[J].学术研究,2019,10(10):170-176+178.
[16]阿莱达·阿斯曼,陶东风,王蜜.记忆还是忘却:处理创伤性历史的四种文化模式[J].国外理论动态,2017(12):87-93.
[17][英]保罗·康纳顿.社会如何记忆[M].纳日碧力戈,译.上海:上海人民出版社,2000.
[18][法]莫里斯·哈布瓦赫.论集体记忆[M].毕然,郭金华,译.上海:上海人民出版社,2002.
[19]M Rothberg.From Gaza to Warsaw:Mapping multidirectional memory[J].Criticism,2011(04):523-548.
[20]李国政,赵楠.记忆与认同:铸牢中华民族共同体意识的逻辑机理——一个档案视角的解析框架[J].档案学研究,2024(06):31-38.
[21]赵静蓉.文化记忆与身份认同[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2015.
[22]钱穆.国史大纲(全2册)[M].北京:九州出版社,2011.
[23][美]本尼迪克特·安德森.想象的共同体:民族主义的起源与散布[M].吴叡人,译.上海:上海人民出版社,2005.
[24]都永浩.从“天下”内聚性思考中华文化认同的内涵与价值[J].民族学刊,2025,16(01):80-90+158.
[25]石硕.从中国历史脉络认识“中华民族”概念——“中华民族”概念百年发展史的启示[J].清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2021(03):1-12.
[26]董建辉,周敏.文化遗产保护传承助推中华民族共同体建设的机理、价值与路径[J].民族学刊,2025,16(10):52-60+156.
[27][德]扬·阿斯曼.文化记忆:早期高级文化中的文字、回忆和政治身份[M].金寿福,黄晓晨,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2015.
[28]赵颖,云桓.以文化记忆培育中华民族文化认同:载体、功能及实践理路[J].郑州大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2024,57(06):97-103.
[29]李建军,李宗赫.以共同历史记忆构筑中华民族共有精神家园[J].民族学刊,2022,13(11):1-8+141.
[30][德]扬·阿斯曼.集体记忆与文化身份[C]//.陶东风,周宪.文化研究:第11辑.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2011:6.
基本信息:
中图分类号:D633;G112
引用信息:
[1]漆晓燚,杨胜才.文化记忆视域下构筑中华民族共有精神家园的价值、挑战与路径[J].民族学刊,2026,17(03):41-49+157.
基金信息:
国家社会科学基金教育学重大项目“学校铸牢中华民族共同体意识教育研究”(VMA250016)阶段性成果