| 280 | 0 | 620 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
在市场化文旅产业的推动下,摩梭母屋作为一个重要的物质媒介,超越原本封闭的、单一民族维度的家族凝聚与精神信仰空间,逐步转型为更加开放和多元的民族文化互动场域。开放而矛盾的现代生活与封闭而高度合理化的技术体系之间充满张力,正是在这种张力的推动下,都市人转身到文旅胜地寻找心灵情感的栖息之所,母屋为那些因工作内卷、思想撕裂与资本压制而疲惫的都市游客,打开了“生活世界”的体验与想象。作为践行“交往交流交融”理念的关键载体,母屋让挣扎于工具理性中的都市游客重温人文价值的光辉、提升本已衰退的感性能力,并在基于主体间性的相互理解中,推动各民族间的文化传播与情感互动由单向消费走向多维互构。母屋实现了从封闭到共享、从地方到都市、从文化自用到文化共鸣的演变,这是文化自信不断积累与扩展的过程,对进一步铸牢中华民族共同体意识具有重要的现实意义。
Abstract:Using ethnographic fieldwork,this article shows how the mother-house(Muwu,refers to the central place where the matrilineal family gathers and all important rituals are held) of the Mosuo people,as a key material medium,has undergone a transformation driven by the cultural tourism market:Historically perceived as an isolated,mono-ethnic space dedicated to family and ritual practices,the mother-house has been refashioned into a more open,plural arena of intercultural interaction.Serving as a material conduit for the practice of "communication,interactions,and integration," the mother-house enables visitors caught in the grip of instrumental rationality to rediscover humanistic values and to revive their diminished capacities for sensuous experience.These dynamics,in turn,hold concrete significance as they contribute to forging a strong sense of community for the Chinese nation.At the level of digital interaction,if rationalized mechanisms merely abstracted the Mosuo mother-house into a consumable symbol,it would,in fact,struggle to attain genuine visibility.Digital technologies,however,do not reduce Mosuo life and culture to simulacra;rather,they extend the very logic of Mosuo productive and everyday practice into the online sphere.Through ties of sharing,empathy,and co-creation,a multilayered,cross-media communication network emerges,involving multiple stakeholders—including local government,digital platforms,Mosuo residents,and urban visitors—who actively participate in its formation.As for economic exchange,financial capital from China's eastern metropolises becomes entangled with cultural-tourism commodities produced in the Southwest.This interaction dissolves one-sided patterns of supply and demand,embedding a logic of mutual benefit within the everyday,crossethnic division of labour.As a result of this reciprocal flow—where urban resources coexist alongside Mosuo cultural-tourism products—an inclusive network of absorption and interaction materializes,catering to the broader requirements of integrated socio-economic development.The symbiotic and mutually advantageous relationship between the prosperous eastern cities and the minority areas of the Southwest China serves as a key driver in the formation of a Chinese economic community.This relationship simultaneously illustrates an inner dynamic of interlocking complementarities across urban-rural and inter-ethnic lines.At the spiritual integration level,urban labor and striving are often constrained by calculative rationality.In an environment marked by escalating competition and fragmentation,work can sever connections to the external world,deepening the divide between urban tourists and minority local cultures.In contrast,the Mosuo mother-house,as a site of vibrant cultural practice,offers meaning-seeking urban visitors an opportunity for intersubjectivity.Through interactions between Mosuo residents and urban visitors,spiritual values associated with Chinese national culture are reinforced and renewed.Consequently,the grand narrative of the Chinese national community no longer remains an abstract idea;it is continually reinforced through tangible material and cultural practices.Grounded in intersubjective mutual understanding,this practice of national cultural tourism transcends mere oneway cultural consumption and substantively facilitates multidimensional interactions that integrate cultural communication with affective convergence.Through processes of interactions,exchanges,and integration,a shared identification is established,fostering stronger cohesion emerges.The motherhouse activates affective resonance and sensibility,enabling different ethnic groups to reach value consensus through communication and form affective bonds amid diversity.The evolution from a community of life to a community of sentiment and ultimately to a community of a shared future constitutes a significant trajectory in the new era for forging a strong sense of community for the Chinese nation.
[1][匈]卢卡奇.历史与阶级意识[M].杜章智,任立,燕宏远,译.北京:商务印书馆,2017.
[2][德]韩炳哲.精神政治学[M].关玉红,译.北京:中信出版社,2019.
[3]云南省民宗委.云南旅游促进各民族交往交流交融现场推进会在丽江召开[EB/OL].(2024-05-16)[2025-3-26].https://www.neac.gov.cn/seac/xwzx/202405/1172937.shtml.
[4]许瑞娟.返景入深林:女性社会性别的多元建构——以永宁摩梭人为例[J].民族学刊,2015,6(05):64-70+115-117.
[5]翁乃群.女源男流:从象征意义论川滇边境纳日文化中社会性别的结构体系[J].民族研究,1996(04):46-53.
[6]严汝娴,刘小幸.摩梭母系制研究[M].昆明:云南人民出版社,2012.
[7]周华山.无父无夫的国度:重女不轻男的母系摩梭[M].北京:光明日报出版社,2009.
[8]许瑞娟.摩梭家屋空间建构的隐喻象征意义解析[J].云南民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2015,32(03):49-54.
[9]曾国华.媒介与传播物质性研究:理论渊源、研究路径与分支领域[J].国际新闻界,2020,42(11):6-24.
[10]郭淼,檀晓涓,赵永波.基于物质的传承与想象:铸牢中华民族共同体意识中的媒介学审思[J].贵州民族研究,2023,44(01):39-45.
[11]李彬,关琮严.空间媒介化与媒介空间化——论媒介进化及其研究的空间转向[J].国际新闻界,2012,34(05):38-42.
[12]赵琛,李明德.从“传递观”到“仪式观”:铸牢中华民族共同体意识的传播学路径[J].青海社会科学,2022(02):67-74.
[13]袁艳,陈朝辉,王家东.中国媒介物质性研究的学术图景及其反思[J].华中科技大学学报(社会科学版),2021,35(04):131-140.
[14][德]韩炳哲.非物:生活世界的变革[M].谢晓川,译.上海:东方出版中心,2023.
[15][巴西]威廉·弗卢赛尔.传播学:历史、理论与哲学[M].周海宁,译.上海:复旦大学出版社,2022.
[16]王玲.乡村公共空间与基层社区整合——以川北自然村落H村为例[J].理论与改革,2007(01):95-97.
[17][德]韩炳哲.仪式的消失:当下的世界[M].安尼,译.北京:中信出版社,2023.
[18]唐胡浩,赵金宝.重塑村落共同体:乡村治理视角下传统文化的现代价值研究——基于席赵村丧葬仪式的田野调查[J].华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2021,60(05):21-33.
[19]余欢.从在地到在线:非遗的媒介化呈现与地方感重建[J].华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2025,64(02):129-138.
[20]张馨元,邵培仁.媒介生态赋能:以中华文化认同铸牢中华民族共同体意识[J].民族学刊,2025,16(02):10-18+141.
[21]韦俊全,谢清果.“图像—意象”共生传播机制下的铸牢中华民族共同体意识效能研究[J].民族学刊,2024,15(04):21-31+123.
[22]蒋婷,苗莉,李春.至味在人间:城市烟火气游客体验的探索性研究[J].旅游学刊,2024,39(07):40-53.
[23][俄]列夫·马诺维奇.新媒体的语言[M].车琳,译.贵阳:贵州人民出版社,2020.
[24]赵静蓉.现代人的认同危机与怀旧情结[J].暨南学报(哲学社会科学版),2006(05):31-36+175.
[25][德]韩炳哲.倦怠社会[M].王一力,译.北京:中信出版社,2019.
[26][德]马克思·霍克海默,西奥多·阿多诺.启蒙辩证法[M].渠敬东,曹卫东,译.上海:上海人民出版社,2020.
[27][英]安东尼·吉登斯.现代性与自我认同[M].夏璐,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2016.
[28][加]查尔斯·泰勒.自我的根源:现代认同的形成[M].韩震等,译.南京:译林出版社,2001.
[29]吴飞,傅正科.“数字共通”:理解数字时代社会交往的新假设[J].新闻与传播研究,2023,30(06):22-35+126-127.
[30]哈特穆特·罗萨,胡珊.分析、诊断与治疗:晚期现代社会形态的新批判分析[J].江海学刊,2020(01):35-44.
[31]周春芳.以空间生产铸牢中华民族共同体意识[J].广西社会科学,2024(05):96-104.
[32]《中华民族共同体概论》编写组.中华民族共同体概论[M].北京:民族出版社/高等教育出版社,2023.
[33]孙九霞,周明.迈向新有机团结:旅游发展驱动各民族“三交”[J].中央民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2024,51(02):5-14.
[34]杨玉文.边疆地区推进中华民族共同体建设的经济意涵研究[J].广西民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2025,47(02):53-60.
[35]魏郡.数字资本主义下的“休闲困境”:资本逻辑与主体疏离的双重张力[J].中国地质大学学报(社会科学版),2025,25(03):11-22.
[36]中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局编译.德意志意识形态(节选本)[M].北京:人民出版社,2018.
①本文依照专业守则对所有访谈人员进行化名处理,采用编号表明,后文亦同。受访人:S8;访谈人:陈海頔;访谈时间:2024年1月;地点:大落水村日尊寺。
②受访人:S9;访谈人:陈海頔;访谈时间:2024年1月;地点:瓦拉壁村尼玛家。
③“斯布阿纳瓦”,一般认为是摩梭人口传中的祖先原居住地,死者之魂都要送到此地。
④受访人:S13;访谈人:陈海頔;访谈时间:2024年2月;地点:大落水村摩梭人博物馆。
⑤受访人:S14;访谈人:陈海頔;访谈时间:2024年7月;地点:大落水村多杰母屋。
⑥受访人:S15;访谈人:陈海頔;访谈时间:2024年8月;地点:大落水村起点客栈。
基本信息:
中图分类号:D633;G206
引用信息:
[1]曹晋,陈海頔.作为物质媒介的母屋:铸牢中华民族共同体意识的空间实践与路径[J].民族学刊,2025,16(12):11-21+153.
2025-12-15
2025-12-15